I’ve recently begun reading J. R. R. Tolkien’s epic trilogy,
The Lord of the Rings. I don’t know why it has taken me so long
to read these three books. In high
school, I read The Hobbit, a tale
that functions as a prequel describing how the Ring ends up in the unlikely
hands of the hobbits of the Shire. The Hobbit gives a considerable amount
of it’s time to describing how Bilbo Baggins acquires the Ring from
Gollum. Gollum, we find out, once was a
Hobbit himself. His discovery of the
Ring led him to murder his friend to possess this precious Ring. The Ring does a number on Gollum,
transforming him from a jolly Hobbit to a slimy creature that eats raw fish and
can’t stand the light.
The Ring, in The Lord
of the Rings trilogy, functions as a symbol and metaphor for the nature of
evil – and most likely sin. It bears the
uncanny ability to transform its holder into an individual concerned only with the
Ring and the power it brings. The longer
an individual has the Ring, the more they come under the domination of its
power. As the Ring functions as a
metaphor for the nature of evil and sin, Gollum displays for us what the Ring
can do to a person. His character is a
tragic one, dominated by desire for the Ring causing him to do all manner of
evil. Gollum is, if there ever was one,
a sinner very far gone.
Not long into the book as we are getting the back story on
the Ring and Middle Earth, we encounter an exchange between Frodo (our hero and
holder of the Ring) and Gandalf (a kind, yet powerful wizard who will help
Frodo in his journey to destroy the Ring).
Gandalf has just filled in Frodo on the true story behind Bilbo’s
acquisition of the Ring and the true evil nature of the Ring. Gollum has been apprehended and now sits in
custody, guarded by Elves. Here’s the
conversation:
‘But this is terrible!’ cried Frodo. ‘Far worse than the worse than I imagined
from your hints and warnings. O Gandalf,
best of friends, what am I to do? For
now I am really afraid. What am I to
do? What a pity that Bilbo did not stab
that vile creature when he had the chance!’
‘Pity? It was Pity that stayed his hand. Pity, and Mercy: not to strike without
need. And he has been well rewarded,
Frodo. But sure that he took so little
hurt from the evil, and escaped in the end, because he began his ownership of
the Ring so. With Pity.’
‘I am sorry,’ said Frodo. ‘But I am frightened; and I do not feel any
pity for Gollum.’
‘You have not seen him,’ Gandalf broke in.
‘No, and I don’t want to,’ said Frodo. ‘I can’t understand you. You mean to say that you, and the Elves, have
let him live on after all those horrible deeds?
Now at any rate he is as bad as an Orc, and just an enemy. He deserves death.’
‘Deserve
it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in
judgment. For even the very wise cannot
see all ends. I have not much hope that
Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it.’ – The Fellowship of the Ring, p. 58
Simply put, what’s great about
this exchange is the tension between the power of evil in a person’s life (if a
Hobbit is a person) and the power of good to finally overcome that evil. Frodo seems to believe that there is no
coming back from the evil Gollum has done.
Gandalf, on the other hand, sees a glimmer of hope. I would venture to guess that most of us,
when we hear news on the radio or TV about the heinous act of a criminal, are
all too prone to believe that the evil in that person has completely consumed
them. We believe that these criminals
are so far gone that nothing or no one can save them. For criminals, we’ve lost hope.
But that’s not where I want to
live. Where I want to live is in the
unresolved tension of hope. Maybe that
criminal will never be free from the evil that has captivated them. But maybe the grace and love of God will fill
them – dispelling all darkness, hatred, violence, and evil. Maybe is a big place, but it’s a place filled
with hope that our God, the very same God who created and sustains the world,
is master over the very strongest of evil.
For me, this land of maybe, this unresolved tension found in hope, has
led me to believe that anytime we judge people in an ultimate kind of way, we
deny that God’s power is greater than sin and evil. What I am not saying is that there should be
no penalty for wrongs done. What I am
saying is that any punishment, any judgment, should always have its eye toward
the unlimited power of God’s love, grace, and mercy to root out sin and evil
from even the most heinous of persons.
There is always hope.
I knew exactly where you were going with this post as I have always loved that discussion between Frodo and Gandalf in the book and in the movie (of course that's the venue I remember in my mind). We do not have the power to judge anyone, yes to give worldly/man punishment, but only God can give the ultimate judgement. This discourse has always been in the back of my mind for the death penalty.
ReplyDeleteBrian,
ReplyDeleteThe death penalty was in the front of my mind while while writing this. I'm against it if only for the reason that we just don't know what God might do in and through the life of convicted criminal. Biblical arguments for the death penalty can be made, but in my opinion they don't usually hold water when set within the context of the entire bible.
Either way, taking the life of evil and depraved person is retributive justice and not restorative justice. As followers of Christ, I believe that we are to always be agents of restorative justice. This is, after all, the stance that God in Christ has taken with us.